Any plans to support Wireguard VPN?

Suggestions/comments/criticisms are welcome here


Posts: 3
Joined: Mon Jul 29, 2013 7:20 pm

Post by abandonow » Thu Aug 30, 2018 2:12 am

any plans to support Wireguard VPN as an alternative to OpenVPN? More info from Arstechnica


User avatar
Posts: 1924
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2008 9:27 pm

Post by James » Tue Sep 04, 2018 10:37 pm
Hi abandonow,

We're keeping a close eye on it, however there is nothing offical we can report at this stage.

James Bekkema
Viscosity Developer



Posts: 7
Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2017 5:36 pm

Post by RaymondLC92 » Thu Nov 01, 2018 4:44 am
Wireguard support would be awesome, OpenVPN connection times are extremely long.


Posts: 1
Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2018 9:51 pm

Post by phlo » Tue Dec 18, 2018 9:55 pm

That would be awesome indeed !

I get that since WireGuard is still a pretty new protocol, it is complicated to officially add support for it as of now. However as an alternative, may I suggest implementing a way to add support for external commandlines ? That way, we'd be able to connect / disconnect the wg commandline tool via Viscosity, but it wouldn't require any official implementation, no ?



Posts: 10
Joined: Wed Jul 19, 2017 7:33 pm

Post by doffactory » Thu Sep 12, 2019 7:14 am
Any update on this? Would love to test it.


Posts: 1
Joined: Thu Nov 21, 2019 4:36 pm

Post by stevej » Thu Nov 21, 2019 4:46 pm
Hi James,

We badly need WireGuard support, and you’re in a unique position to deliver it. You recently released Viscosity 1.8.2, which adds ARM64 support. As far as I’m aware, that makes Viscosity the only option for OpenVPN on the Surface Pro X.

Unfortunately, we Surface Pro X users have no way of running WireGuard. The official WireGuard app dies when it tries to load the x86 network (wintun) driver, since Windows 10 on ARM apparently doesn’t support x86 drivers.

WireGuard is comprised of only 4,000 lines of code, and OpenVPN’s days look numbered. Can you please give us WireGuard support—preferably this year? :D


6 posts Page 1 of 1